Sunday, December 27, 2020

The First Amendment is Once Again Under Attack and Fundamentalists and Politics

 
 
IN THIS ISSUE:
  
 
 
 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
Click on the link below to donateand tell us what you want your donation used for in the comment section
 
 
December 27th 2020 Newsletter
 
 
 
 
Support Donald Trump
Call Both Senators and your U.S. Congressman ASAP
 
January 6th is the do or die day for the rule of law and the future of our children. The House and Senate meet in joint session that day for the opening of the electoral ballots and the counting and declaration of the next President and Vice President. Yet with the massive election fraud in five or six states the vast majority of the country is painfully aware of the voter fraud that flipped the vote in those states.
 
The Supreme Court has refused to enter the fight, preferring that the state legislators deal with this as is their right to de-certify an election and substitute their own slate of electors for Trump. Likewise a single U.S. Congressman or Senator can object and throw the two bodies into separate meetings for discussion, debate, and declaring a contested election which throws the selection of the President into the House with one vote per state and into the Senate where there are two votes per state. As Republican states outnumber the Democrat states, Trump and Pence win.
 
Yet as we have seen with Justice Roberts, the Never Trumpers are out there including Mitch McConnell and many others.
 
Please call both of the two Senators and call your own Congressman and demand that they stand up and object and that a failure to do so means the loss of your vote and your support and a primary challenge. Be sure and give your address and zip code and political affilation. Call till you get an answer and rather than get frustrated if you keep getting a busy signal consider that evidence that many others are expressing their outrage. Be polite but be firm, support Trump and the rule of law or be prepared to pay a heavy price for cowardice.
 
James Lankford U S Senate
 
WEBSITE: here
 
PHONE:
(202) 224-5754 (Washington D.C.)
(918) 581-7651 (Tulsa)
(405) 231-4941 (OKC)
 
 
James Inhofe U S Senate
 
WEBSITE: here
 
PHONE:
(202) 224-4721 (Washington D.C.)
(918) 748-5111 (Tulsa)
(405) 208-8841 (OKC)
(580) 234-5105 (Enid)
(918) 426-0933 (McAlister)
 
 
KEVIN HERN's Website: CD 1
Phone:
(202) 225-2211 (Washington, D. C.)
(918) 935-3222 (Tulsa)
 
 
MARKWAYNE MULLIN'S Website: CD 2
Phone:
(202) 225-2701 (Washington, D.C.)
(918) 423-5951 (McAlister)
(918) 687-2533 (Muskogee)
(918) 283-6262 (Claremore)
 
 
 
FRANK LUCAS'S Website: CD 3
 
Phone:
(202) 225-5565 (Washington, D.C.)
(405) 373-1958 (Canadian County)
 
 
TOM COLE'S Website: CD 4
Phone:
(202) 225-6165 (Washington, D.C.)
(405) 321-7369 (Norman)
(580) 357-2131 (Lawton)
(580) 436-5375 (Ada)
 
 
 
 
Christian Fundamentalism and Politics
 
America was built upon tolerance and the rights of others to go about their business and life as they saw fit. The founding fathers were not that far removed from the endless wars of the 16th and 17th centuries and pilgrims coming to a savage new world to escape religious persecution. The founding fathers were more deists than Christian, believing in a higher power more than the “Christian” theology that preached the only path to heaven was through Jesus. Some were indeed Christians and some of their wives were Christian but the majority of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were written by God fearing men more aligned with Deism than Christianity and it shows in their separation of Church and state.
 
Why? Because they had seen earlier generations risk all to avoid a state religion that persecuted all that refused their version of Christian doctrine. They were anxious to not repeat those mistakes in government. Allowing the freedom to choose and to debate choices in order to have a better government was paramount.
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. “
 
Right there in the First Amendment, ahead of speech, the press, the right to assemble, or to petition for change. Now uniformity in a society leads to better harmony as more think alike than not yet at what cost? I think the founders knew this above all and realized that a chaotic stable of religious theories was a lesser evil than attempting to hammer all through one mold.
 
Still there was friction. The Quakers, later the Mormons, friction became bloodshed and intolerance led to migration further west in the case of the Mormons. Society changed and around the turn of the 20th century the Fundamentalists emerged, those willing to fight for the “fundamentals”, the aspects of Christianity that they felt were both threatened and immutable. These folks felt that the Bible was infallible, that the Biblical stories were to be taken literally, that Christ was born of a virgin, that Christ died and was reborn, and that Christ died upon the cross for our sins which atoned for their sins both past and future.
 
In the fundamentalist mind the Bible was under attack by logic, reason, and science. Archaeological discoveries were poking holes in Bible stories, science was beginning to explain disease and the physical world, and the explosion of printed matter coming down in cost and up in variety spread knowledge where ignorance once ruled. Modern life was loosening the chains upon people and how they thought. Between 1840 and 1920 Historical Criticism was developed, an investigation into the Bible to understand the “world behind the text.” Comparing stories in the Bible against each other or against contemporary texts surviving from the time the Bible was compiled was a search for both deeper meaning and as a defense against modernism undermining the Bible.
 
It wasn't long before the fundamentalists had become to rigid or radical for a good number within their own ranks and Evangelicalism split off, a group that described themselves as the more rational and moderate branch. The Presbyterian and Baptists were quite concerned with the rise of radical fundamentalist theory so it must have been a relief to see some abandon the theory or it could have been troubling that any moderating minds had left.
 
By the 1970's fundamentalism had established itself deeply in the Southern states of the U.S., the 1925 Scopes Trial showcased the deep divide that Darwinism and other scientific theories and facts had generated in society, especially around the idea that life evolved. As science and research began peeling back the mysteries of life these fundamentalists felt increasingly under attack. Little Timmy didn't die because God wanted to call him home; he died from a microbe that caused a disease. So the split widened between the more rational and moderate Christians and those that looked at every new discovery as an attack on Christianity.
 
Then in the sixties a series of court decisions removed religion from schools. By the eighties the far right religious groups were forming, Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, and Pat Robertson had increasing leverage over politics. Yet on a national level and even on a state level their support was rarely in double digit ranges. People simply had evolved past relying upon pastors and priests interpreting the Bible and began relying upon their own view of how government and life interacted.
 
 
Since the eighties the far right religious folks have stagnated. Never enough to have a real impact on a general election, they did have some impact in primaries where enough of their people would get out to vote. On occasion they rise up like they did in 2019 where OCPAC and a group called The City Elders announced a coalition and an effort to impose a religious test upon those running for office. OCPAC was to be the “political arm” of the coalition yet that partnership sputtered out and died a quick death. OCPAC had been ran by an abolitionist that ran OCPAC as a campaign office for Gubernatorial candidate Dan Fisher and OCPAC had rapidly lost both numbers and clout.
 
An executive for a janitorial company in OKC named Bob Linn took over at the low point and many had hoped for a return to the center. What happened was a weekly blog that dived deeper and deeper into radical fundamentalism and instead of coming to the center of American and Oklahoman politics it degenerated into more of a church than a political action committee.
 
Sadly politics is barely mentioned anymore in the weekly blog/newsletter and the stories center around how it is the other churches leading America into communism and destruction. Monday's edition of the OCPAC newsletter spends a good amount of time making that obvious. Below is most of the article that focused on attacking other Christian groups. I have underlined the most troublesome sentences.
 
 
 
 
 
“This film exposes shocking developments throughout the entire breadth of 21st century Christendom. Protestants, Catholics, and the Orthodox church have been infiltrated. Our beloved evangelistic organizations have seen wolves in sheep's clothing rise to the very top.
 
The head of the Russian Orthodox church is a KGB agent. The Pope is a Marxist. The evangelical church has been deeply penetrated. That penetration goes to the very top of institutions we thought were rock solid. This includes the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA), the Southern Baptist Church, the former Campus Crusade for Christ (now, CRU), and many others.
 
The evidence is iron clad. I was on the staff of Campus Crusade for Christ and worked with founder and President, Dr. Bill Bright. Sadly, I have been made aware that Marxist concepts have become pervasive at their national conferences over the past few years. It is both clear and stunning. Marxist language is now a part of their programs on campuses throughout the nation.
 
I've also spent many years in the Southern Baptist Church. In addition, my wife and I founded a PCA church in our living room many years ago. In spite of my close relationship with all these institutions, the evidence of their fall from Godliness is overwhelming.
 
In the near future, I plan to focus on the developments within the organization I once knew as Campus Crusade for Christ.
 
It is important to expose these enemies who have crept into Christendom. These have entered our Christian institutions in an effort to destroy the Church. The "gospel" they promote will bear no fruit. Marxist ideology mixed with Bible verses will produce neither salvation nor the health, peace, and prosperity of civilizations.
 
Marxist concepts like social justice, critical race theory and the myths inherent in the concept of "white privilege" are ungodly, contrary to all of the Scriptures, and represent evil and destructive weapons designed to destroy the church, the family, and societies. They are drenched in narcissism and hatred.
 
These ideas, now permeating most of our seminaries and academic institutions (beginning in elementary school), will soon destroy the nation if we do not expose them for the evil they represent.”
 
I think that most of our readers will agree that social justice, critical race theory, and white privilege are damaging theories and if left unchecked would continue the destruction of America. Where Bob Linn and OCPAC loses most of us is in their statements to demonize the vast majority of Christian Churches. More troublesome is the idea that they and they alone have a lock on what is truth and what is fiction. You can kind of understand their thought process, in their world the Bible is the end all authority and as they believe they are God's chosen ones, who else can share this burden?
 
But, attacking Churches like this is beyond intolerant. It is divisive, it is arrogance and pride. It is madness to scream that only your group has the way forward and yet OCPAC allows this to be printed in their name.
 
If there is a litmus test for how Christian a person is it must surely be how much love they spread and how little judgment and condemnation they do. Yet the Bob Linns of this world spread division and hate instead of tolerance and understanding. No one is saying that your Church has to allow gays to attend, the right of association is still here. No one is saying that you have to believe as another believes, that is other than Charlie Meadows, Bob Linn, and OCPAC because they consider you and your Church to be evil if your beliefs are not their beliefs.
 
A battle is about to rage for the soul of America both at the national level and at the state level. The never Trumpers and the radical abolitionists associated with OCPAC and any other abolitionist group needs firmly repudiated and solid Christians need to be placed in power at the GOP Party level and then the power of the Party needs used to push the legislature to restore common sense and good government. If we fail to do this expect massive tax hikes this year as the race to fund the Medicare expansion and to cover the losses due to the pandemic is used to stampede the conservative legislators into supporting tax hikes or exemption closings. Expect a sales tax upon all services including mortgages, insurance payments, and every other un-taxed transaction under the sun.
 
 
 
 
The First Amendment is Being Attacked
 
An Alleged Child Molester is Attempting
to Force the Release of
Journalist Source Material
 
Last year was the beginning of the end for Wagoner County Commissioner James Hanning's political career and perhaps the beginning of the end of his liberty to walk around freely. During a deposition on an embezzlement lawsuit that was counter filed against him his step daughter was deposed as she had worked part time in the office of the rental management company. At the very end of the deposition a simple question was asked: “Why do you not get along with your stepfather James Hanning?”.
 
The answer was a shock, Commissioner James Hanning was accused of molesting the woman in some manner starting when she was in grade school and ending once she left the home in her later teen years. The lawyer for Commissioner Hanning was one Eric Jordan, a sitting assistant D.A. n Wagoner County and later in Creek County. Jordan stopped the questioning, saying that this was evidence of a crime and he questioned the then 26 year old woman at length. Ending with “You might want to seek some counseling for this.”
 
Months later with zero movement on the issue, STP ran a story which broke the issue open and the very next day the local D.A. for Wagoner County, Jack Thorpe, sent a letter to the OSBI asking that an investigation be opened and announcing that he was turning things over to the Attorney General for a conflict prosecutor to be appointed.
 
About one year later and not a thing has happened. Commissioner James Hanning is still in office and other than the original interview with the victim not a single thing has been done or said.
 
So STP was surprised to hear that a lawyer representing Commissioner James Hanning had issued a subpenoa for a recording, one between ADA Eric Jordan and a fellow attorney discussing the Commissioner Hanning case. At the beginning of the embezzlement case Commissioner Hanning and a bevy of other county officials or toadies began an effort to have Paulsen railroaded to prison on false charges in order to prevent him from fighting back. On the recording Jordan first admits that he knew the original charges against Paulsen were bogus and the “victim” was so crazy as to be unbelievable. Here is a link to the first story we wrote about the recordings.
 
In the second story about the recordings at this link, Eric Jordan throws his client under the bus, after a long discussion on how the charges came to be filed against Tyler Paulsen with the following comment:
 
Eric Jordan: “...So that's how the ‘App to Accelerate’ got started in the first place. They didn't know about it until James gave him that. Yeah, that's it.”
 
Eric Jordan is referring to Commissioner James Hanning going down to the Adair city clerk's office and falsely informing them that Paulsen was not supposed to have gun rights. Remember that this is the same man that prosecuted Paulsen using a witness he knew was not to be believed on the very charges that Commissioner Hanning was falsely claiming stripped Paulsen of his gun rights.
 
Later in the tape Eric Jordan goes further, admitting that his client is pushing to get the innocent man prosecuted for a technicality on charges that he knows were unfounded:
Eric Jordan: 00:06:24 :
"Yeah. And so, anyway, moving forward. He doesn't have any authority over any prosecution of Tyler at all. He may think he does. He has none. And that shit’s going to that, that shit is dead.” …........ “We're fine. I think Tyler's going to be fine. There's no f*cking way he's going to prison for this cockamamie bullsh*t. Is it a technical violation? Yes. It's not a prison offense. “
 
Later in the conversation Eric Jordan emphatically agreed with this statement that was made:
 
““It's a bullshit move. I mean, what's he trying to do? Get a f*cking advantage to the litigation.”
 
A bit later in the conversation Eric Jordan made it clear that eight year old children coming forward with allegations of molestation are believed enough that the accused ends up at the police department.
 
Eric Jordan: 01:34:19 Yeah, but I’ve rarely, I've rarely come across a case except for people with major substance abuse problems or what have you. That if an eight-year-old child goes to them with an allegation like that, they ended up at the police department. So, I don't know. Again, I don’t know the history”
 
That makes it pretty clear that anyone other than political elite winds up facing charges if allegations of molestation are made.
 
A few seconds later Eric Jordan talks about if an eight year old could be believed. By this point apparently from Jordan's statements, Commissioner Hanning and his wife are claiming that the victim C is a pathological liar. The victim had said during deposition that she told many people about the molestation including within months after the first molestation, telling her mother about the allegations.
 
Eric Jordan: 01:34:45 Well if it's true, I mean all they do is tell me that she's a pathological liar, this, that and the other. But my only, my only retort to that, which I didn't say out loud is, really you're going to suggest that an eight year old girl’s a pathological liar, cause my experience has been that it would be an extreme rare occurrence that an eight year old girl would be a pathological liar. …..”
 
 
At the end of the conversation Eric Jordan is asked if it bothers him that Commissioner James Hanning might have helped railroad an innocent man:
 
It bothers, you would say, well, why it bothers me, a County commissioner. Now again, this is small, small areas, small town, and I've seen people get elected to positions and then all of a sudden, they think they have power. But as a, you know, a member of the law enforcement community, I'm going to tell you that whatever he did, if he did anything that spurned into action DA's offices in prosecuting Tyler, I'm going to ensure no matter what I have to do, but back channels since my office is not involved, but I will back channel it and ensure that nothing happens because it shouldn't. As a matter of principle, whatever his offense was, and it's a technical violation.”
 
And this was February 9th 2020 and as of today the charges remain against Paulsen despite the original prosecutor knowing the witness was innocent, and even after the original charges were dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction over the case after the Indian SCOTUS case blew up Oklahoma court decisions.
 
You will notice that in the original story we said that we were not releasing everything, just enough to prove the point and give officials the chance to clean up their own mess. The next week we gave a bit more hoping this will prod them to do the right thing. After that we let things cool down as another horrendous story on malicious prosecution was coming out of Wagoner County.
 
Now you have a recording where a sitting Assistant District Attorney throws his client under the bus, admitting that he forced a plea deal on an innocent man, then later sat back and did nothing while his boss D.A. Jack Thorpe allowed false charges to be filed against the same innocent man that claimed his gun rights had been revoked. Then the attorney admits that it was pretty clear that Commissioner James Hanning had a part in pushing the persecution and prosecution of an innocent man. Then the same ADA states that the molestation allegations should have been believed and a a police investigation started years ago.
 
And talk about wondering what color the sky is in his world, you have Commissioner James Hanning's attorney trying to force us to hand over the recordings and start the discussion all over again. After seeing the subpoena we called the silly attorney and told him no, we are not giving over the source of our story or the recording.
 
We are journalists and have protection from the First Amendment and from a state law that states unpublished material isn't discover-able as long as the material can be discovered from other sources. We told the lawyer that Eric Jordan might have a copy of the tape, he will certainly know who recorded the tape and who to ask for a copy or ADA Eric Jordan can just admit that he said what we reported that he said. No need to hear the tape if Jordan admits what he did. And Jordan cannot deny what he said without committing perjury.
 
Mr. lawyer wasn't happy and pressed for the tape. Our response was that it was a valuable property, that it was the kind of tape that could ruin lives so we used only what was needed to prod the officials to do their jobs, we do not want the entire tape out in public if it can be avoided.
 
But if pushed into releasing the tape there will be no reason not to use it ourselves. That caused some sputtering and exclamations of extortion. Hardly, here is the statute on extortion:
 

§21-1483. Extortion or attempted extortion

Every person who extorts or attempts to extort any money or other property from another, under circumstances not amounting to robbery, by means of force or any threat such as is mentioned in Section 1482 of this title, upon conviction, shall be guilty of a felony.
Fear such as will constitute extortion, may be induced by a threat, either:
1st. To do an unlawful injury to the person or property of the individual threatened, or to any relative of his or member of his family; or,
2nd. To accuse him, or any relative of his or member of his family, of any crime; or,
3rd. To expose, or impute to him, or them, any deformity or disgrace; or,
4th. To expose any secret affecting him or them.

 
The tape is our property, we have already discussed what Eric Jordan and Commissioner Hanning have done in exhaustive detail. We have already published stories that have detailed accusations from others in legal filed depositions and court filings, all public records. We are asking to be left alone, not asking for money or other property, just to be left alone and our property (the tape) unreleased.
 
An attorney has already volunteered and stepped forward to handle things for us, asking for the subpoena to be quashed under journalist privilege. Having an accused child molester that had been caught red handed trying to illegally prosecute an innocent man in order to hamper the innocent man from protecting his property from embezzlement trying to bully us into releasing the tape just isn't going to happen.
 
We can see the need if Commissioner Hanning is facing felony charges for child molestation and needs to not be surprised in court with the fact that his own attorney, a sitting ADA, had  thrown him under the bus. Even then Commissioner Hanning needs to go first to the source and get a copy before attacking the First Amendment by attacking a journalist. But if push comes to shove, the rest of the tape will provide for one hell of a story that many in Wagoner County would prefer not be told.
 
The first paragraph of this article has the link to the first story, here is the second story on the Paulsen/Hanning case, Then start reading the archived newsletters from this date forward and you will find more than a half dozen stories on this travesty of justice of a case.
 
   

Sunday, December 20, 2020

American Taliban Lash out at Tea Party Being Allowed to Speak at Rally

 
 
IN THIS ISSUE:
  
 
 
 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
Click on the link below to donateand tell us what you want your donation used for in the comment section
 
 
 
 
 
 
Well That Escalated Quickly
The American Taliban Lash Out
at the Inclusion of the Tea Party at Rallies
 
One of our stories last week was more hopeful that accurate it seems. The article about the Trump rally last Saturday remarked on the skills needed to pull off an event with a diversity of speakers including political pariahs such as the Ekklesia/abolitionists groups, far right religious groups like OCPAC/John Birch Society, and more moderate conservative groups and individuals like the Sooner Tea Party and elected officials like Oklahoma County Clerk David Hooten.
 
Perhaps the story jinked the entire effort because despite the conciliatory article expressing hope and good will both OCPAC and the Ekklesia/abolitionist leaders quickly turned on both Mayor Hobbs and the Sooner Tea party. That doesn't mean it was a mistake to cooperate at a rally with these types, it does mean that rarely will the radical groups like OCPAC, the John Birch Society, the abolitionists, and Ekklesia play well with others.
 
Now this story is told not to place blame or castigate, it is told to educate those new to Oklahoma politics. There is a common perception that all groups ought to get along when working on an issue or defending Trump. This story will provide some clues as to why that is so difficult and why some groups have sadly become pariahs in the Republican Party. It will also discuss the danger to both Trump's agenda in Oklahoma and the danger to the Republican Party itself by being taken over by far right religious radicals.
 
Now back to the story, particularly the Tea Party found itself attacked for mentioning homosexuals or gays, not in a positive light, but simply acknowledging their use of political tactics effectively. Mayor Hobbs reported that he received viciously angry phone calls from Ekklesia/abolitionist leader David Navejas complaining that he was “treated like a piece of sh*t” and calls from OCPAC leaders complaining about the mention of gays at the rally.
 
Sadly Mayor Hobbs sided with the religious radicals, stating that he was stabbed in the back by the Tea Party. Betrayal, sabotage, Judas Iscariot indeed! Or simply bat sh*t crazy people that cannot get along with others?
 
Below is a discussion of what we are facing when attempting to deal with radical groups in politics and why they have historically all failed and have become social and political pariahs..
 
 
Sociopaths, Psychopaths, and Politics
 
The difference between the two types is that a psychopath doesn’t have a conscience but a sociopath does but it is a very weak conscience and it doesn't stop them from doing evil. And politics is rife with both kinds.
 
Psychopath refers to a person with a personality disorder that exhibits antisocial behavior, a lack of empathy and remorse, coupled with boldness, a lack of inhibition, and egotistical traits. There will be 4% or more in any given society and sometimes they are darned useful and other times they are intolerable.
 
In life there are just some people that need killing. For all our laws and customs and religion saying otherwise, in life and in society there will always be those that must be taken out in order to protect society. Some say there are sheep, sheep dogs, and predators. In reality there are sheep, sheep dogs, predators, and those who seek out and kill the predators. I call the latter the wolf killers or predator controllers. Sociopathic behavior will exist on a spectrum, the sheep dog, predator, and predator killer will all have some place on that spectrum with the predator at the top or least empathetic, the sheep dog charged with protecting the flock in the center, and the predator killer or more commonly known as a soldier being at the 75% mark. They can do what is needed without harming society.
 
Those that must defeat evil must do so from a position of honor and decency, using teamwork versus individual action in order to maintain their sense of proportion and balance and even human decency. Then there is a huge need for teamwork. One man sent out to do battle and defeat eight adversaries before falling is of less value to the effort as a team of twelve focusing on on a threat, eliminating the threat, and turning to other threats in turn and returning unscathed. Sociopaths and psychopaths tend not to work well in groups or armies as both organization types tend to be bureaucracies that require order, comradery, and a definitive hierarchy.
 
There there is this. Most of the heinous acts done in life are not done by monsters but by ordinary people who believe they are doing good.
 
Sociopaths are drawn to certain types of work, here is a list ranked by popularity.
 
  1. CEO
  2. Lawyer
  3. Media (TV/radio)
  4. Salesperson or Politician
  5. Surgeon
  6. Journalist
  7. Police officer
  8. Clergy
  9. Chef
  10. Civil servant
 
The common thread is self control, being at the top of the food chain, and being able to control others.

Of particularly concern are the preachers and the politicians. Oscar Wilde once wrote that charity creates a multitude of sins. I believe that Ann Rand was also trying to get this across in her writings. The theory of moral licensing explains this, when humans are good, moral licensing says we give license to be bad.
 
Two distinct types of moral licensing exist. The first is the moral credentials approach which is rationalized by stating that someone has done some good, so they can exhibit some ambiguity because they believe they are more good than evil. The second type is the moral credits approach, where morality is like a bank account where you make deposits of good behavior and withdrawals when you do bad things. The person doesn't need to rationalize the bad behavior, as long as they do more good than evil they are comfortable with and feel entitled to commit some evil.
 
 
 
    
Two Examples of Moral Licensing
 
 
Meet Daniel Navejas of Ekklesia and Bob Linn of OCPAC. Both work hard to claim to be religious by nature and leaders of religious organization yet their behavior is anything but Christian like when it comes to interpersonal conflicts and political conflicts. Both claim the high moral ground by denouncing any opposition to be driven by Satan or by Godless liberals and both are intolerant of constructive criticism. The basis we believe is in a warped and twisted form of Christian faith.
 
I have met true Christians that are amazing and sincere, walking the walk but seldom preaching and insulting others. They tend to lead by example and there is no doubt that a Christian leader of this nature brings in a thousand times more converts than an entitled and arrogant preacher.
 
Then there are the David McLain's, the Daniel Navejas's, and the Bob Linn's of the world. They appear to be eaten up with a sense of entitlement because of a warped belief that they are the “chosen” ones, the elite members of the family of God, conferring the absolute right to look down upon those that are not one with their ideology
 
Some of it is our theology. Many Christians develop a sense of entitlement because they believe they are the “chosen ones”, the “elite”, the members of the family of God. Some feel this gives us the right to look down upon others who are not one of us. Part of it might be their understanding of God's grace and forgiveness, thinking that if God can forgive them for all their sins that gives them the right to be horrible people to those they feel are “unequal” or those that would be “unequally yoked” with them if they attempted to cooperate for a political or social cause. They cannot empathize with those they consider below them or unequal to them. I do not think they realize that God's grace isn't a license to shamelessly abuse others.
 
Then there is the attitude of these types, being critical and judgmental of others using what they consider to be lawful statutes; passages from the Bible that provide an almost legal justification for bad behavior as they believe they and they alone are capable of discerning the truth and thus always be right. This in their minds give them license, if not a moral duty, to point out other's failings and sins. As you can imagine this is not well received by those that can see the obvious hypocrisy from those that are visibly loaded up with sins of their own and failings in life of their own.
 
Then there is the behavior that the rest of the world sees as massive hypocrisy which leads to return criticism against Christianity for unjustified criticism, the ability of these kinds of “Christians” to decide which sins are worse than the others, ignoring greed, pride and gluttonous sins that are abundant in our own churches while singling out homosexuality and murder. Which is easily understood in that standing at a pulpit facing hundreds of overweight people that revel in a sermon that denigrates others or attacks the gays when in fact a number of the audience are likely addicted to p*rn and even gay p*rn.

 
Look no further than recent Christian preacher scandals, Jim Baker, or Jerry Falwell and his wife who are alleged to have carried on a sexual relationship with a young man they met when he was a pool boy with the pool boy and wife having sex while Falwell sat and watched, Bishop Eddie Long for multiple accusations of homosexual relationships with young men in Georgia, Pastor John Paulk caught in a D.C. gay bar flirting with men, Ted Haggard who was the president of the National Association of Evangelicals who admitted to hiring gay prostitutes for sex and drugs and an affair with a male member of his church, Southern Baptist Convention Board Member Lonnie Latham who faced criminal charges in 2006 for soliciting an undercover Tulsa police officer posing as a male prostitute, Tony Alamo who is spending 175 years in prison for transporting boys and girls for prostitution and child p*rn, or Jimmy Swaggart who was caught once in 2008 and again in 2011 with prostitutes and the last time telling his church that "The Lord told me it's flat none of your business."

 
There are dozens of examples that those that are preaching from the pulpit are just as likely to be terrified of homosexuality for personal reasons than for their son or daughter being led astray. Are they worried about losing the culture war or worried about being exposed?

 
The Sooner Tea Party is anything other than a LGBTQ or whatever they call them supporter. We believe in freedom and liberty and Constitutional rights which give these poor folks license to live life as they wish as long as they do not demand special rights and keep sexual behavior private. Don't like what they do but we will defend their right to live freely. So Bob Linn claiming that STP is supporting LGBTQ rights is simply ludicrous. What was said was that the gays were effective in organizing and raising resources to achieve political goals and that like Trump we ought to join with anyone that believes in Trump's agenda including the gays.
 
I wonder if Bob Linn and Daniel Navejas would scream and abuse Mayor Hobbs if Trump showed up and spoke at a rally? Trump is known for being the most openly supportive President towards gay rights and gay people, appointing an openly gay ambassador, appointing an openly gay Filipino man to the 9th Circuit Court, actively courting the gays by advancing plans for supporting AIDS research, and announcing an effort to decriminalize homosexuality world wide. Trump did this and peeled about 20% of the gays away from the Democrats in the 2020 election. Smart man.
 
These Navejas and Linn's behavior reminds me of a verse I learned in Lutheran Sunday school:
 
Isaiah 28:15
Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
 
The verse was explained to us older teenagers as Judea making a deal with a local ruler, tribute and support in exchange for safety of their community, the overflowing scourge being an army headed to Egypt if I remember correctly from nearly five decades ago. BTW that didn't work out well for them. Loudly proclaiming morality and attacking others in order to insulate oneself from homosexual desire or for demonizing one sin while ignoring the dozen other sins rampant in the congregation might do well for collecting donations while passing the plate but it isn't stopping a preacher addicted to sex.
 
Mayor Hobbs for his part took the side of the abolitionists against the Tea Party. In our defense we were invited to a Trump Rally, not an evangelical or abolitionist rally and comments were prepared accordingly.
 
The idea that mentioning gays in anything other than a negative light would be objectionable never crossed our imaginations. Lin and the pastor that he brought to speak had plenty to say, one and I forget which, railed about living in sin before marriage or cohabitation, and a opening prayer that lasted about eight minutes long certainly were not appreciated by the average attendee. I mean, half or more of the attendees likely had cohabited or had sex outside of marriage or certainly knew most of their friends and family would be guilty of doing so. And any prayer than lasts longer than a half minute to one minute tops isn't about God. The first 30 seconds were, the rest were about the preacher.
 
Mathews 6:1-34 has plenty to say about public prayer:
 
Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven.”
 
Thus, when you give to the needy, sound no trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be praised by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.”
 
And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites. For they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward.” ...
 
Daniel Navejas complaining about being treated like....McDugle... was as inexplicable. Navejas introduced himself and the fact that STP had hit him more than once was discussed with Navejas stating that he was wanting a good relationship with the Tea Party. That was unexpected on his part, but any repentance is a welcome thing so we laid out the issues that had caused his problem; attacking and picketing churches including Rep. George Faught's own church, picketing the homes of politicians, and the disenfranchising of Republican Party members in Logan County, which the abolitionists had seized in 2018. Navejas either agreed to stop the behaviors or denied having a part in them, and the two sides shook hands and on our part we thought there was a good outcome. Apparently Navejas had second thoughts and rather than behaving as a Christian, much less as a Christian pastor, Navejas ignored what scripture says:
 
Mathew 18:15-17
If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother.”
 
But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every charge may be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.”
 
 
Mayor Hobbs for his part also has forgotten the wisdom of scripture. Hobbs felt betrayed and said so loudly in a phone call later in the week. Now the Bible dealt harshly with betrayal, it is not a trivial charge to lay as a Christian:
 
Acts 1:18
Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.

 
This scripture concerns Judas Iscariot, one of the twelve disciples of Jesus. Judas betrayed Jesus by identifying him by kissing him when Roman soldiers arrived, AKA the Judas kiss, leading to the crucifixion and death of Jesus, in exchange for 30 pieces of silver. Afterward, Judas was remorseful, tried to return the money, and hanged himself.
 
But if you read the different translations of the Bible you get as many versions of the story as there are translations of the Bible. One states that after learning that Jesus was to be crucified Judas gave the 30 pieces of silver to the priests, who couldn't accept the blood money, so Judas flung the money on the ground and left and hanged himself. Afterwards the priests used the money to purchase some land that was used for burying foreigners, a sort of potters field.
 
Another story also mentioned in the Bible was that Judas used the money to purchase the field but upon his first visit he was in an accident, falling down and bursting his abdomen. Was this portrayed as an accident or the vengeance of an angry God for not showing remorse?
 
Another account written in the second century A.D. Claims that Judas was stricken by God's wrath, bloating up so that he couldn't fit down a city street, so swelled that his eyes couldn't be seen, his genitals enormously swollen and filled with pus and worms. The story claims that Judas killed himself on that land by pouring out his innards onto the ground which stank so bad that a century later people still held their noses when passing the property.
 
Another story told of Judas overcome with remorse, going home to tell his wife what he had done. The wife was roasting a chicken over a fire while Judas said he was going to kill himself before Jesus rose from the dead and punished him. The wife laughed and said that Jesus could no more rise from the dead than he could resurrect the chicken she was roasting. Immediately the chicken was restored to life and started crowing, causing poor Judas to run away in fear and hang himself.
 
Other stories such as the Gospel of Judas had Judas dreaming a vision of the other disciples persecuting him and stoning him to death.
 
But these stories were of a disciple betraying someone above him, leading the soldiers to him, identifying him by kissing him, and receiving a substantial sum of silver. Is mentioning in passing the effectiveness of the gay's political tactics worthy of charges of betrayal? Is talking with a fellow speaker quietly to attempt to resolve a conflict also betrayal?
 
Of course not. The problem is that Mayor Hobbs has spent much time infiltrating the groups and gaining their trust and attempting to build a power base by getting the various factions to get along. And there are no boundaries it seems, Rep. Kevin McDugle brought up on stage with decent men and women. If you don't know the guy search on Duckduckgo.com for Kevin McDugle Oklahoma. The top results were being convicted of wasting marital assets in divorce court and sex scandals/allegations from his wife and from one of the many court hearings, one of which had McDugle admitting under oath that he was a sex addict.
 
Now that goes different on Google with big tech protecting liberals and persecuting conservatives. But the same appears if you dig a few pages deep.
 
When you attempt to put cats and dogs together will you be surprised if they fight? Is that betrayal?
 
But were this tactic to be successful, what good can come out of dealing with wild eyed religious fanatics? In fact this article covers the abolitionist/Ekklesia effort to take over the GOP which would be a complete and utter disaster if it were possible. What would be possible is that the group could interfere and sabotage other efforts to put Trump supporters in charge of the GOP.
 
Interestingly enough Pastor Blair of Fairview Baptist Church denied that his church was part of the network of 300 Oklahoma churches that were part of Navejas's abolitionist movement and denied there being such a large coalition of churches behind Navejas. Charlie Meadows of OCPAC denied anything nefarious was going on and denied attending church  at and Nevejas's home.
 
Another story covers the voter fraud that was alleged to have been used in the takeover of the Logan County GOP. These are Democrat tactics, the very tactics that have been used against our President Trump. The local election board reported those registered to vote in the home, with as many as a dozen registered voters and up to ten kids, fourteen total adults in all, 24 individuals living in a four bedroom home....The state election board directed the Logan County Election Board to turn it over to the local D.A. who turned out to have a personal relationship with the owner of the home.  So no investigation.
 
 
Of the 13 candidates that the abolitionists had put up last summer only one made it into office, Senator Hamilton who defeated Senator Boggs. This is the problem of the abolitionists, their support among voters is in the 8 to 10% range at most as they consider a mother that has a tubal pregnancy to be guilty of murder if she aborts the fetus. A tubal pregnancy is where the fetus attaches outside of the uterus. The fetus cannot grow or survive and infection sets in leading to the death of the mother if the body doesn't miscarry or if an abortion isn't performed.
 
Some abolitionists have promoted monitoring miscarriages and referring a miscarriage to the local D.A. for investigation for possible murder.
 
And if this wasn't enough of a poo production, the newly elected abolitionist senator Warren Hamilton has allegedly refiled Senator Silk's abolitionist bill from 2019. If there is no exception carved out for exceptions for women that face serious danger to their reproductive system or their life then the bill will be dead on arrival, pardon the pun. If that happens can Hamilton control the abolitionist crazies or will we see a repeat of 2019 where abolitionists were picketing churches calling pastors baby killers for being “only” pro life and picketing Senator's homes and terrifying their families? If this happens Hamilton will be forced to denounce his own base or risk becoming Joseph Silk 2.0.
 
 
The saddest part of all of this is the damage to Mayor Hobb's reputation and as an indictment of his judgment for attempting to bring together religious fanatics with decent, law abiding, Trump supporting, fed up Oklahomans. By making himself the public face of the abolitionists and the John Birch Society/AKA/OCPAC he basically loses a vast amount of public support as the Republican conservatives and RINOs both agree that radical religious groups have no place in GOP leadership decisions. Hobb's only chance is to refute the abolitionist groups to avoid becoming tainted.
 
And even worse, Mayor Hobbs is a long time outspoken supporter of the anti vaccine and the Epic Charter School system issues.   If this abolitionist bill gets heard and fails, will the abolitionists go crazy once again and slash and burn  those that vote against the aboltionist bill?  Will families be terrorized again at home and at church?  Will any of this bleed into support for the other issues?
 
We also have to remember the City Elder/John Birch Society/OCPAC coalition last year that proclaimed they were taking over the GOP and imposing a religious litmus test up on all candidates. That imploded dramatically, some say over the disaster of a conference where the John Birch Society learned that there was little support for far right radical religious groups from taking over society.
 
The previous year the John Birch Society/OCPAC group had backed far right pastor Dan Fisher in a failed bid for Governor and then spearheaded the abolitionists attacks against House and Senate leadership. That ended only when a Sooner Tea Party story outed T Russell Hunter with a video of a drunk driving arrest that ended with the cop pointing out that Hunter had pissed in his pants. With their leader taken out the sheep did scatter, ending the massive ill will at the Capitol over the abolitionist bill ran by former Senator Joseph Silk. The attacks ended Silk's political career, he was persona non grata in the senate thanks to the vicious attacks by the abolitionists and he didn't re file for office.
 
And OCPAC will claim that the Sooner Tea Party hates them and is trying to ruin them, they have before. Here is a newsletter where a lady blows that idea to smithereens after OCPAC claimed that STP (Sooner Tea Party) had sent one of Charlie Meadows's OCPAC newsletters to Channel 4 and got an racism story started. In fact initially we refused to provide an comment and when we did we supported Charlie Meadows stating that he wasn't racist, but perhaps a bit bigoted towards those not in his church. The story of the racism charges against OCPAC are easily found by Googling the words OCPAC and racist. Our decision to respond to the reporter was only to avoid being tarred with Charlie Meadow's bigoted attack on black culture.
 
And one thing we know for sure, Americans tend to be tolerant but they also have common sense. As an example, Trump supported the gays but he drew the line at allowing transgenders into the military. We support the First Amendment and honor our religious leaders and Churches yet we abhor bigotry from radical religious cults. We might not care for gay marriage but we draw the line at demonizing others. We fully understand why these groups have earned the nickname of American Taliban and believe that until they learn to respect others they have no right to be part of civil discourse.