Wednesday, June 1, 2022

TULSA ATTORNEY INVOLVEMENT IN TRAFFICKING

TULSA ATTORNEY'S  INVOLVEMENT IN TRAFFICKING 

OF CHILDREN FOR SEXUAL EXPLOITATION? 

 (PART 1)

 By Orpheus

 Pictured N. Scott  Johnson and his offices at 11th and Detroit, source Martindale Hubble and Google.

Tulsa Attorney Noelle Scott Johnson (‘Johnson’) has practiced Family Law in Oklahoma for decades.  Ironically when he gets involved in cases, years later the opposing parties find themselves accused of felonies for the first time in their lives.  In cases where Johnson’s clients are the accused,  the reporting party loses custody.  Johnson donates heavily to judges, develops unholy relationships with prosecutors, and has assisted powerful individuals who are accused of exploiting children sexually.  


Johnson is a homosexual man with no children nor husband.  He only practices Family Law in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and other nearby counties.  He charges four, five and six figure retainers and bills at about four hundred dollars an hour.  Johnson has a decadent stand alone office building at 11th and Detroit in Tulsa, Oklahoma, catty corner from the downtown Home Depot.  


Johnson does not appear to win many of his cases at trial instead often using the process, the same cast of therapists, psychiatrists, visitation experts, and manipulating others to get what he and his clients desire.  Often the same list of professional characters appear in his cases: therapist Carrie Short and Jamie Vogt, Guardian ad Litem (GAL) attorneys Cathy Welsh or Stephen Hale, Tulsa Attorneys Jake Aycock, Becki Murphy and Adrianne Barnett, Psychologist Bart Trentham, visitation supervisor Anna Cowdrey and others.


Vietti Matter

In cases where Johnson’s clients are the accused somehow the other party still loses custody to the accused abuser.  Take the case of Johnson’s client Christopher Vietti (‘Vietti’) who has been pending trial for a misdemeanor domestic violence charge since 2018.  Johnson has represented Vietti for four years in a related divorce.  Weeks prior to Vietti’s criminal trial in February 2022 the Tulsa County District Attorney Stephen Kunzweiler (DA Kunzweiler) begins prosecuting the alleged victim, Vietti’s divorcing wife, for child stealing, alleging her a ‘liar’ about abuse and to substantiated DHS allegations of sexual abuse on the minor children. 


DA Kunzweiler is currently prosecuting the abused woman’s husband while at the same time accusing her of lying about the same instances of abuse and danger to the children.  Ethically both statements can not be true yet DA Kunzweiler proceeds to prosecute both parties.  The children have substantiated sexual abuse and yet Tulsa County Judge Kurt Glassco (Judge Glassco) has intervened without notice or a show cause hearing to give custody to Vietti’s mother.


According to the affidavit of probable cause  in the mother’s child stealing case, DA Kunzweiler was contacted by attorney Cathy Welsh (Welsh) who allegedly recommended the charges.  Welsh is the GAL appointed by Judge Glassco in the Vietti matter.  A year and a half ago in February 2021 Welsh was sued in the Northern District of Oklahoma Federal Court along with therapist Jamie Voigt by the mother in the Vietti matter for malpractice.  It is thought that Welsh and Judge Glassco’s actions are revenge for civil suit against Welsh and all are designed to benefit Johnson and his high dollar client.


On Monday, May 23rd, 2022, the Oklahoma Supreme Court held an emergency hearing contesting Judge Glassco’s guardianship in the Vietti matter.  In October Judge Glassco granted the emergency without a hearing, without notice, and while the mother was living out of state with the children in an abused Womens’ shelter.  Judge Glassco has since recused from the Vietti matter.  Online records show attorney Johnson giving previously to Judge Glassco’s reelection campaigns even though this year Judge Glassco ran unopposed.


Judge Glassco was last opposed in 2014 wherein he ran against Tulsa Attorney Jill Webb.  Judge Glassco’s slogan was ‘another family for Glassco’ supposedly a gaff on his opponent, a lesbian woman.  It is unknown why Judge Glassco is doing Guardianships as online records indicate he is assigned to probates ever since an unrelated 2014 incident.


In the 2014 matter Judge Glassco ran a mentally retarded homosexual mans sentence, who was accused of two forcible anal sodomy charges, consecutive, one after the other, even though he ‘promised’ the defense attorney to run the charges concurrent, or at the same time, allegedly to induce a blind plea, a plea without recommendation from the State.  In that matter the prosecutor, attorney Kevin Grey, supported the Defense attorney’s rendition of the ‘promised’ plea deal, concurrent, ie- (20) twenty years not (40) forty.  That Defendant eventually got his trial rights back although Judge Glassco attempted to withdraw the public defenders office without cause and appoint a local attorney to attempt to ‘coerce’ the Defendant in sticking with their ‘deal.’


The mother in the Vietti matter is still charged with child stealing of her own children.  She has four hours of supervised visits with the children each week.  Vietti is still charged with the misdemeanor domestic violence even though DA Kunzweiler infers the charges bogus in his recent filings against the mother.  Vietti is set for trial in August, his wife for Preliminary Hearing in June for not ‘sharing’ the children and no trial date is set for the four year pending divorce.


This article is planned to be part of a three part expose.  Tune in soon for more.